The Diversification Puzzle
نویسنده
چکیده
The levels of diversification in U.S. investors’ equity portfolios present a puzzle. Today’s optimal level of diversification, measured by the rules of mean–variance portfolio theory, exceeds 300 stocks, but the average investor holds only 3 or 4 stocks. The diversification puzzle can be solved, however, in the context of behavioral portfolio theory. In behavioral portfolio theory, investors construct their portfolios as layered pyramids in which the bottom layers are designed for downside protection and the top layers are designed for upside potential. Risk aversion gives way to risk seeking at the uppermost layer as the desire to avoid poverty gives way to the desire for riches. But what motivates this behavior is the aspirations of investors, not their attitudes toward risk. Some investors fill the uppermost layer with the few stocks of an undiversified portfolio; others fill it with lottery tickets. Neither lottery buying nor undiversified portfolios are consistent with mean–variance portfolio theory, but both are consistent with behavioral portfolio theory.
منابع مشابه
Tackling The Corporate Diversification – Value Puzzle Using The Real Options Approach
This paper analyzes the diversification-value puzzle from the Real Options (RO) approach. Our proposal conceives corporate diversification as a process which involves both the sequential replacement of prior acquired investment opportunities by assets-in-place and the generation of new valuable growth options. We argue that this conceptual framework allows to explain both documented diversifica...
متن کاملThe Diversification Discount Puzzle: Empirical Evidence for a Transactions Cost Resolution
Prior literature on the diversification discount and the relative efficiency of internal versus external capital markets provides decidedly mixed results. We argue that transactions cost economics are useful in understanding this puzzle. According to transactions cost economics, diversified firms should outperform single-segment firms in industries with higher external transaction costs (e.g., ...
متن کاملThe International Diversification Puzzle Is Not as Bad as You Think
In simple one-good international macro models, the presence of non-diversifiable labor income risk means that country portfolios should be heavily biased toward foreign assets. The fact that the opposite pattern of diversification is observed empirically constitutes the international diversification puzzle. We embed a portfolio choice decision in a frictionless two-country, two-good version of ...
متن کاملThe international diversification puzzle is not as bad as you think 1
In one-good international macro models with non-diversifiable labor income risk country portfolios are heavily biased toward foreign assets. The fact that the opposite pattern of diversification is observed empirically constitutes the international diversification puzzle. This paper embeds a portfolio choice decision in a two-country, two-good version of the stochastic growth model. In this env...
متن کاملLoss Aversion, Asymmetric Market Comovements, and the Home Bias
Loss aversion has been used to explain why a high equity premium might be consistent with plausible levels of risk aversion. The intuition is that the different utility impact of wealth gains and losses leads loss-averse investors to behave similarly to investors with high risk aversion. But if so, should these agents not perceive larger gains from international diversification than standard ex...
متن کامل